Skeptical theism tackles the problem of evil by proposing a limited skepticism about the purposes of God, and our abilities to determine whether any given instance is truly an example of gratuitous evil.
This collection of essays presents cutting-edge work on skeptical theistic responses to the problem of evil and the persistent objections that such responses invite. Part I investigates the epistemology of skepticism as it applies to evils and the nature of epistemic humility.Skeptical Theism New Essays Edited by Trent Dougherty and Justin P. McBrayer. Presents cutting-edge work on skeptical theistic responses to the problem of evil and the persistent objections that such responses invite; Offering a balanced treatment, this collection of 22 newly-commissioned essays move the debate of sceptical theism forward.Skeptical theism is a strategy for bringing human cognitive limitations to bear in reply to arguments from evil against the existence of God. This entry will consider the four most prominent forms of skeptical theism.
Christianity seems bedeviled by a “paradox of humility and dogmatism.” On the one hand, one of the greatest virtues in Christian spirituality is humility, a deeply held awareness of our limitations and sinfulness that propels us to seek guidance and forgiveness from others, and especially from God. On the other hand, there is the equally significant strand of dogmatism, understood as the.
Trent Dougherty and Justin McBrayer's Skeptical Theism: New Essays6R is a collection of twenty-two essays by leading lights in religious epistemology. The essays are well-argued and briskly presented, and Dougherty and McBrayer's preface and analytic table of contents for the essays are helpful and clear.
Agnosticism, the Moral Skepticism Objection, and Commonsense Morality Agnosticism, the Moral Skepticism Objection, and Commonsense Morality Chapter: (p.293) 21 Agnosticism, the Moral Skepticism Objection, and Commonsense Morality Source: Skeptical Theism: New Essays Author(s): Daniel Howard-Snyder Publisher: Oxford University Press.
Skeptical theists have been charged with being committed to global skepticism. This chapter considers this objection as it applies to a common variety of skeptical theism based on an epistemological principle that Stephen Wykstra labeled “CORNEA.” Further, it shows how a recent reformulation of CORNEA (provided here by Stephen Wykstra and Timothy Perrine) affords a formal apparatus that.
Skeptical Theism. If God exists and if God is all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good, why horrendous evil? If it is good to know God, why is God hidden? Skeptical theism is the claim that we puny humans, with three-pound brains of corruptible meat, cannot comprehend a Creator God.
To appear in Justin McBrayer and Trent Dougherty, eds., Skeptical Theism: New Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) Skeptical Theism and Skeptical Atheism At the heart of skeptical theism are claims such as these three, defended by Michael Bergmann (2009): S1 We have no good reason for thinking that the possible goods we know of are.
Trent Dougherty (PhD Rochester) teaches in the Philosophy Department and the Honors College at Baylor University and writes in Epistemology, Philosophy of Religion, and Philosophy of Language. He is the editor of Evidentialism and Its Discontents (OUP), co-editor (with Justin McBrayer) of Skeptical Theism: New Essays (OUP), and author of numerous essays, reviews, and reference works in his areas.
Sceptical theism claims that we have vast ignorance about the realm of value and the connections, causal and modal, between goods and bads.. Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-62. Sceptical Theism and Divine Lies.. Lester E. Krueger - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):324. Analytics. Added to PP.
This aptly named book contains twenty-three new essays. In the preface, the authors say that (a) the collection moves the debate over the viability of sceptical theism forward; (b) the contributors are (fairly evenly) divided between established scholars in the field and up-and-coming scholars working in philosophy of religion; and (c) they aimed for a collection that is balanced.
I then consider (DePoe’s, in: Skeptical theism: new essays, 2014) positive skeptical theism, arguing that while DePoe’s view might provide a response to my argument, it entangles the theist in.
COMMONSENSE SKEPTICAL THEISM1 Michael Bergmann (pre-print; published in Science, Religion, and Metaphysics: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga, eds. Kelly Clark and Michael Rea (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 9-30.) Commonsensism takes commonsense starting points seriously in responding to and rejecting.
Skeptical theism is the view that God exists but, given our cognitive limitations, the fact that we cannot see a compensating good for some instance of evil is not a reason to think that there is.
Essays and Papers. Please click on the essay titles below to view the essay.. Please help support the blogging efforts of A Tippling Philosopher! Recent Posts. Moving House; The Problem With “God”: Skeptical Theism Under The Spotlight; Free Will and the Leap of Faith; The Tories and their blatant cronyism. It disgusts me.
Consequently, Wielenberg’s new argument from evil fails and positive skeptical theism remains a viable response to the evidential argument from evil. Read more Discover more.